Conquent: Without Limits
Conquent: Without Limits
Michael Bissell's Blog

Portland Bike Plan: Too Expensive or Playing with numbers?

2010-02-03 15:11:00
Shortcut URL: http://t.conquent.com/X800

The Oregonian today published a front page article that questioned if Portland can afford $613M over 20 years to improve bicycle routes (Portland Bike Plan goes before City Council, but can the city afford it?). They compared this to the cost of the MAX Green Line of $575 or the annual transportation budget of $630 million for all of Portland.

Shocking numbers, and they must have intended to shock because they downplayed some basic math.

First, the big number isn't really that big: $613 million over 20 years is $30.65 million a year or 4.8% of the current budget. They say that 6.4% of Portlanders commute by bike; so we're under serving the bike population with no increase in ridership. Regardless of the fact the plan is intended to greatly increase ridership, that 6.4% also ignores casual cycling and non-commuter trips.

Then there's comparing apples to mushy brussels sprouts. The MAX Green Line is 6.5 miles, as opposed to the 681 miles of bikeways proposed in the plan. And, the development of the MAX line greatly improved the I205 bike lane, getting bikes off the road surface in dangerous places like Foster Road or Powell Blvd. which makes me question how much of that budget would have been defrayed with this plan.

At the very end of the article they quote "Geller" (who's credit was somehow cut from the article but must be Roger Geller, the City Bicycle Coordinator in the Office of the Director, Transportation Planning Division) where he mentions that $630 million would only pay for 12 miles of urban freeway.

12 miles of freeway, 6.5 miles of light rail, or 681 miles of bikeways, but the Oregonian presents it as "too expensive"

What do they teach in these schools these days...



Next
The Web is a Jerry Rigged Kludge
Previous
Twitter: Asleep at the Mouse Wheel


Jane Blue: Re: Portland Bike Plan: Too Expensive or Playing with numbers?
2010-02-03 16:09:00

Over 20 years? Absurd.


Eric Weaver: Re: Portland Bike Plan: Too Expensive or Playing with numbers?
2010-02-03 17:58:29

Newspaper editors NEED that 12 miles of Freeway to drive their BMWs and Mercedes real fast, as if on the Autobahn. All them granola-munching bike riders can stay outta the way...


Comment on this blog
Your name:


Your email (will not be displayed):


Subject


Message



Enter the text above to help us filter spam: